Jump to content

User talk:DSWebb

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Here you can post me any messages you want to:

linsangs

[edit]

Check out User:UtherSRG/Carnivora. - UtherSRG (talk) 18:15, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi DSWebb. I see your addition of taxobox to this article. In my opinion, calico shouldn't have a taxobox as it is not a taxonimical article. It's not a species or subspicies, it's not even a breed. Calico is just a color pattern that can happen to many breeds of goldfish and possibly other related cyprinids too. This article definitely needs some cleanup and the taxobox is probably not supposed to be there. What do you think? --Melanochromis 20:44, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, if you insist, I guess we can leave the taxobox there for now. But in the future all taxobox in goldfish breed articles will be replaced with "breed box" (per WikiProject Tree of Life guidelines) just like in the case of dog breeds, cat breeds, and horse breeds. Maybe you might be interested to design the breed box? Cheers. --Melanochromis 21:32, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
That's great! I'll be happy to help filling in origins of breeds. --Melanochromis 18:04, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Goldfish breed box

[edit]

Excellent job with the breed box. I was researching origin of each breed and came across some more breed standards that you might be interested to use. It's here. This AFCCSF (Aquarium Fish Committee of the China Society of Fisheries) seems like an important Chinese club and even has government fisheries officials as their committee. I suspect we will find a lot more info about it if we can research in the Chinese language. Unfortunately, I don't understand Chinese beyond some 50 most basic words. --Melanochromis 20:03, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. It seems I have not read the same news as you have read: see Talk:Clouded Leopard#New range map, but also the forst paragraph in today's WWF issue. Did WWF make any mistake? I think they most insist about Borneo because they work on Heart of Borneo program, but that it doesn't mean that clouded leopards found on Sumatra island as different, and should have to be ranged with the continental clouded leopards... smiley Hégésippe | ±Θ± 19:00, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Science lovers wanted!

[edit]
Science lovers wanted!
Hi! I'm serving as the wikipedian-in-residence at the Smithsonian Institution Archives until June! One of my goals as resident, is to work with Wikipedians and staff to improve content on Wikipedia about people who have collections held in the Archives - most of these are scientists who held roles within the Smithsonian and/or federal government. I thought you might like to participate since you are interested in the sciences! Sign up to participate here and dive into articles needing expansion and creation on our to-do list. Feel free to make a request for images or materials at the request page, and of course, if you share your successes at the outcomes page you will receive the SIA barnstar! Thanks for your interest, and I look forward to your participation! Sarah (talk) 20:00, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, DSWebb. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Amaryllis - Latest revision as of 20:45, 16 September 2018 (edit) (undo) (thank) DSWebb (talk | contribs) (Picture is of a Hippeastrum not Amaryllis)

[edit]

Are you sure? Btw: A Hippeastrum is an Amaryllis isn't it? --Neptuul (talk) 09:44, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, DSWebb. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, DSWebb. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The file File:Common ameiva range.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]